Results

How we evaluate

Risk-Avert benefits from a dual process evaluation.  Working with independent academics we evaluate the impact of the programme using quantitative and qualitative methods each academic year.

At the secondary level this is focused on the outcomes and benefits of the programme for schools and young people.  We use valid and reliable measures which evidence the progress of students pre and post delivery.

In addition, we have funded a PhD Studentship in partnership with the school of health and human sciences at the University of Essex.  This work began during the 2015/16 academic year and is a fully funded three year project.

The work of our PhD student focused on the validity and reliability of the Risk-Avert screening tool and the longitudinal impact of the programme finding positive outcomes for both.

At the primary level, we evaluate the distance travelled of participating pupils and evidence their acquisition of skills which can help them avoid risky situations and lead to positive outcomes related to health and well-being. 

What we measure

At secondary we measure three key domains for young people, these are:

• Self-Efficacy
• Resilience
• Mental well-being

These measures are completed pre and post by young people completing the targeted elements of the Risk-Avert programme.

In addition, qualitative focus groups are completed with selected schools and school staff.

For more information on how we evaluate the programme and the outcomes that Risk-Avert can deliver for your school or local area please get in touch.

At primary we measure:

Skills acquisition which helps children make safe choices.

Knowledge and ability to recognise unsafe and risky situations.

Planning and taking action to manage risk and stay safe. 

Get in Touch

Case Studies

Below are two case studies highlighting the impact of the programme and the benefits and outcomes for staff and students.

St Martin's School Case Study

Download

Stanway School Case Study

Download